Draft EU regulation for 'Green Passports' being fast-tracked

Tracey O' Mahony, Barrister at Law in Ireland, urges the Irish people to lobby MPs to vote against the proposed fast-track review procedure for a Digital Green Certificate.

It proposes accepting three types of evidence for free travel:

It suggests that while unvaccinated people will still be permitted to travel (gee, thanks), they will be subject to limitations, such as mandatory testing:

The proposal is for a regulation, rather than a directive, because a regulation can come into operation very quickly:

Of greatest concern is that, while they state this certificate for travel should be 'suspended' once the Covid manipulation is over, it can be brought back very quickly. Once they've got the digital system in place, your freedom of movement can be restricted repeatedly in the future, any time the WHO declares there is even the potential of an epidemic:

And let's remember, the WHO redefined 'pandemic' 10 years ago, to make sure they were able to shout 'fire', regardless of the numbers of actual deaths and cases of illness.

They're doing their best to make sure they can legally restrict our movements any time they say we're putting each other's health at risk.

---

Excerpt from Tracey's template letter to MPs:

Having considered the text of the Digital Green Certificate Regulation, this proposal is without doubt the most dangerous precedent around liberty, and freedom of movement since the inception of the Irish free state. I consider your vote as to whether you will agree to a fast-track review of this regulation to be one of the most defining decisions you will make during your tenure as an Irish Representative within the European Parliament.

My immediate concerns surrounding this regulation include:

• There is absolutely no evidence that vaccination stops transmission of SARS-CoV-2.

• All vaccines are still only in Phase 3 and therefore have no long term follow up data on safety or adverse effects.

• All manufacturers have been indemnified for any and all adverse reactions including immediate and long term, they therefore have no incentive to be either truthful or proactive in rectifying any issues. All manufacturers have multiple lawsuits against them for fraud with other medicines, what makes anyone think that they have found morals for vaccines?

• Mass vaccination may increase spread of disease as seen with the Dengvaxia in the Philippines.

• The WHO have stated that the PCR test is not fit for purpose and The Lancet has also concluded that "PCR testing is therefore not the appropriate gold standard for evaluating a SARS-CoV-2 public health test."

• To impose the "Green Pass" is the same as imposing travel papers on Jews by the Nazi's. It infringes on human rights to - travel, assembly, privacy, conscience and free and informed consent.

• This pass would violate Article 191 of the Treaty of Functioning of the EU

• Some of these vaccines are based on gene modification which is totally new, and no one has any idea what will happen in the future to people who take it. Prominent scientists and doctors have already written to the EMA to express their concerns.

• There is a real concern over people's medical data being misused.

• As with other vaccines there is risk of viral mutation and type replacement being created by vaccination.

• Never has an infringement on human rights by governing bodies ever been withdrawn voluntarily, this is not a temporary measure.

---

Link to draft legislation: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX%3A52021PC0130&from=EN

Link to Google Drive with draft letter to MEP and MEP contact list: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1jwpXij_VKV9LE9Unw3Dv-fBKX036NPyw