No jab, no job? Don't be ridiculous.
- BTM
- Feb 19, 2021
- 4 min read
First of all, let's be clear: vaccines CANNOT under current law be made mandatory.
Under section 45E of the Public Health (Control of Disease) Act 1984 (Medical treatment):
Regulations under section 45B or 45C may not include provision requiring a person to undergo medical treatment.
“Medical treatment” includes vaccination and other prophylactic treatment.
In addition, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe – of which the UK is still a member – has adopted Resolution 2361 (2021): Covid-19 vaccines: ethical, legal and practical considerations.
Although there is no legal obligation for the UK to abide by the resolution, the Assembly “urges member States” to comply with the terms of the resolution, which include:
7.3.1 ensure that citizens are informed that the vaccination is NOT mandatory and that no one is politically, socially, or otherwise pressured to get themselves vaccinated, if they do not wish to do so themselves;
7.3.2 ensure that no one is discriminated against for not having been vaccinated, due to possible health risks or not wanting to be vaccinated;
But there is still some debate as to whether employers could slip a jab requirement into staff contracts, possibly under some hokey Health & Safety guise, along the lines of it being a 'reasonable' requirement under people's duty of care to do all they can to keep themselves and those around them safe.
Right. We're expected to accept that our employers can require us to undergo an invasive medical procedure that could result in injury or even death, or we're not allowed to work? People who are vulnerable or who believe the 'vaccine' will save them are quite welcome to go ahead, but to ask people with perfectly healthy immune systems to potentially compromise their health in this way is a massive violation of bodily integrity and human rights.
If a worker was coerced into having 2 or more needle-fulls simply because they couldn't afford to lose their job and later suffered facial paralysis or death, could the employer be charged with GBH or manslaughter?
I realise the chances of death appear low - and I say 'appear' because the only hard data is from the government's Yellow Card reporting scheme, and who knows how many adverse events aren't reported - but the number of injuries isn't particularly low, in my opinion.
One significant area is nervous system disorders - that's things like a cerebral haemorrhage, facial paralysis, tremors & seizures. An absolute minimum of 2 in every 1,000 people will suffer some kind of nervous system disorder and that rises to a minimum of 3 in every 1,000 if we're just looking at the Oxford/AstraZeneca job.
Pre-Covid, it was estimated that only 1% of vaccine injuries were reported, but let's assume that's much higher now, given the PR focus on this particular coronavirus. Assuming as many as a third of injuries are being reported, then that's around 1% of people suffering a nervous system disorder from the 'recombinant, replication-deficient chimpanzee adenovirus vector encoding the SARS CoV 2 Spike glycoprotein'-based vaccine.
In terms of which is more harmful....With the Ox/AZ jab, there's a 50% greater risk of dying, double the risk of suffering a nervous system disorder, nearly six times the chance of suffering tremors and and you're almost three and a half times more likely to have flu or a flu-like illness. With Pfizer, you're about 50% more likely to go into cardiac arrest (although the chance of dying is about the same), more than twice as likely to suffer facial paralysis, [ironically] two and a half times more likely to get Covid and around twice as likely to have a pulmonary embolism. Kinda six and half a dozen...
And these are just people's immediate and early adverse reactions. We have absolutely no idea about the possible long-term effects. One that's of very real concern is the potential for antibody dependent enhancement (a.k.a. pathogenic priming or cytokine storm), where your immune system goes into hyperdrive when it meets the wild virus. In coronavirus vaccine tests on animals conducted after the SARS-CoV-1 outbreak in the early '00s, the adverse reactions were so extreme - with the cytokine storm response to the wild virus killing or injuring all the animals - that they didn't proceed to human trials.
Oh, and don't forget that Bill Gates is so worried about the danger of adverse events that he says vaccines shouldn’t be distributed until governments agree to indemnify against lawsuits. (See his interview with CNBC in April 2020 - timecode 11:39 to 12:53.) And that's what's happened. The pharmaceutical companies, manufacturers, distributers and those delivering the vaccines have indemnity, so it's the government (i.e. our taxes) that will pick up the bill for all successful injury claims - now and into the future.*
Back to the jab/job business... Although you might view the overall chance of being seriously injured or dying as low, it is still a risk and you simply can't force people to put themselves in harm's way. Those administering the vaccine are required to get informed consent from the patient - but I wonder how many of them are being entirely transparent about the known risks, no matter how small. Are they making it clear that all the vaccine products are still in their trial phases** and only have temporary approval for supply because a pandemic has been declared? Are they being honest about the fact that we just don't know what might happen 6 or 12 months down the line?
There are quite enough known risks already to warrant giving serious consideration to going ahead with a jab.
For the government to be pushing a biased, blanket campaign to get every adult vaccinated and even entertain the idea that employers could sack their staff for refusing to comply, when so much is unknown, is deeply concerning.
Government Yellow Card data up to 7th February:
*The Government previously released the outcome of the human medicines regulations consultation. This outlines that the Government will be liable for any adverse implications from a vaccine being put into supply (both immediately and into the future).
- From the BMA (scroll to the bottom).
**According to the trial protocols released by the manufacturers in September 2020, the trial participants will be monitored for around two years from the first dose. The final visit date stated in Pfizer's protocol is 714-742 days after the first dose; for AstraZeneca it's 730 +/- 30 days. That means the Phase 3 trials will end between summer and autumn 2022.
Comments