Kary Mullis and the PCR scam
- beyondthemainstream
- May 26, 2021
- 3 min read
Updated: Sep 9, 2021
In 1993, Kary Mullis was awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in recognition of his invention of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique.
But what is PCR?
It’s an amplification process that essentially allows scientists to see more of something. A sample is put through a certain number of amplification cycles, which doubles it each time. So, after 20 cycles, a single thing is now over half a million things (524,288), meaning you can see something exists that maybe you couldn’t see before.
At 25 cycles, you’ve now got over 16.5 million of this thing; at 31 cycles, you’ve got over a billion.
In terms of using PCR tests to identify ‘cases’ of Covid-19, the WHO originally recommended 45 cycles, which is what the NHS used. That’s over 17.5 trillion times the size of the original sample (1 x 45 cycles = 17,592,186,044,416).
Okay, so you’ve got more of the thing. What does that mean?
In Kary’s own words:
"[PCR] is just a process that's used to make a whole lot of something out of something. It doesn't tell you that you're sick; it doesn't tell you that the thing you ended up with was gonna hurt you."
"It allows you to take a very minute amount of anything and make it measurable and then talk about it like it's important - that's sort of a misinterpretation."
Source:
Okay. So you’re looking for a virus in someone in order to classify them as a ‘case’ and a threat to the health of others. You take a swab from deep inside their nasal cavity and make it 17.5 trillion times bigger. I’m no scientist, but I’m going to guess you’ll find a whole load of stuff.
Excellent explanation of the cycle threshold from Del Bigtree on The Highwire – begin at 07:27
What is the PCR test actually looking for at the moment?
Well, the virus has never been isolated and purified – the ‘sequence’ for SARS-CoV-2 was created by a group of around 20 virologists, who took 37 base pairs of what they thought might be the genome of the intact virus (taken from unpurified samples), then put them into a computer program, which filled in the rest of the base pairs – around 29,960 – required to make up a full genome.
Each time they ran the program, it came up with a slightly different sequence, so they pretty much took a vote on which one they reckoned was most likely to be approximately right for SARS-CoV-2 and, POOF!, we had a sequence. A sequence that was passed around the world as the definitive one, but which could actually be the sequence for any kind of coronavirus – who knows?!
Oh, and did I mention that the PCR test can’t distinguish between live and dead viruses?
“With PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody.” - Kary Mullis
So, when you get a positive test result, it could simply be detecting a fragment of dead virus from a cold you no longer have. It could be a big old false positive nothingburger. It certainly doesn’t mean you’ve got a potentially deadly disease.
The truth about PCR and the sequencing of the virus has been buried by governments and mainstream media for nearly 18 months now. A case is being brought against Christian Drosten (the German scientist who proposed that PCR should be the ‘gold standard’ for Covid-19 testing), scheduled to be heard in court in November 2021. Even Drosten knows it’s a flawed test when it comes to being used as a diagnostic:
"These PCR tests are so highly sensitive that even very healthy and non-infectious people may test positive."
(Drosten, speaking about PCR tests in relation to the MURS virus in a German business magazine in 2014)
Even with all the censorship in the mainstream, there is still one person who might have been able to blow the whole PCR testing scam out of the water, right from the start....
Kary Mullis was well-known for being outspoken and eccentric. He rubbished Anthony Fauci, called out the CDC’s role in pushing pharmaceuticals on bogus claims of disease…and probably his most contentious claim was that HIV doesn’t cause AIDS.
He would have called bullshit on all of this and nobody could have accused him of not knowing what he was talking about.
Unfortunately, he’s dead. Died of pneumonia in California in August 2019, right before Event 201 and just a few months before Covid-19 hit the headlines.
Now, isn’t that a coincidence?
Comments