Is the admission by Pfizer that it didn’t test for transmission of the virus REALLY a ‘bombshell’?

No, it’s not. In an article published in the BMJ on 21st October 2020 – yup, TWO YEARS AGO – Peter Doshi, the associate editor, clearly stated:

“None of the trials currently under way are designed to detect a reduction in any serious outcome such as hospital admissions, use of intensive care, or deaths. Nor are the vaccines being studied to determine whether they can interrupt transmission of the virus.”

Here’s a summary of what the trials were set up to do:

See PDF of full article

The only endpoint being studied was whether symptomatic disease could be prevented. None of the vaccines are designed to stop you getting infected or transmitting the virus, they're only designed to reduce the symptoms. They're vaccinating you against COVID-19, not SARS-CoV-2. (And doing a lousy job of even that!)

Note also that excluded from the trials were: under-17s, immunocompromised people (the ‘vulnerable’) and pregnant or breastfeeding women. And yet, from the moment these nasty little jabs hit the market just 6 weeks after this article was published, they made a start on ramming their concoctions into the arms of the eldest and most vulnerable all over the world, with no clue as to how they’d react. No clue. And yet the medical establishments, politicians and the mainstream media screeched “SAFE AND EFFECTIVE” for everyone, with not one scrap of evidence.

Now, two years on, thanks to Dutch MEP Robert Roos asking a Pfizer rep point blank in the European Parliament whether their mRNA vaccine was ever tested to see if it blocked transmission of the virus, we’ve had a public admission that it wasn’t.

This admission is being treated as a bombshell, a scandal, and Roos says, “This removes the entire legal basis for the COVID passport.”

But it’s not a bombshell, or it shouldn’t be. Any journalist who had bothered to look at the trial protocols, which were made publicly available in September 2020, would have seen that they were only testing the ‘vaccines’ for symptomatic disease. Just look at the titles of the Pfizer and AZ trial protocol documents!

Full trial protocol documents: Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, Janssen

It’s also worth noting that in all these trials, they only started monitoring the participants for COVID-19 14 days after the second dose. So any discomfort, adverse effects or COVID-19 symptoms suffered any time between the first dose and two weeks after the second dose weren’t logged in the trial data.

Check out Moderna:

So, thank goodness some more light is being shed on the truth about these injectables, but it is, in fact, old news and there’s a long way to go yet before the population at large will realise they’ve been utterly duped.

---

Related BTM blogs: