Dr Mike Yeadon: "Everything your government has told you about this virus is a lie."
- beyondthemainstream
- Apr 30, 2021
- 5 min read
Updated: Sep 9, 2021
“If you’re frightened, you’re suspicious, you think something’s up…you’re absolutely right.”
Dr Michael Yeadon has a BSc in biochemistry and toxicology, a PhD in respiratory pharmacology and is the former Vice President and Chief Scientist for Allergy and Respiratory at Pfizer.
Here are excerpts from his interview above with Planet Lockdown about the Covid-19 pandemic:
On lockdowns: “I knew quite early on that [they were] rubbish. Only people who are ill and have symptoms are really strong infectious risks to other people and those people are not walking around in the community, because if you’re full of virus and symptomatic, you are also ill, and ill people tend to stay at home.”
“We’ve always quarantined the sick because that’s how you avoid infecting the wider population. The idea of quarantining the well - this so-called lockdown – is a new idea and it has no foundations whatsoever, either in science or in the history of controlling epidemics.”
On the PCR test: “It’s completely fraudulent the way it’s being done. You simply cannot run a technique like that at industrial scale and expect the results to be meaningful. One of the frauds our government and they people they’ve hired to run the testing have done is that they’ve refused to entertain the idea that there’s something called the false positive rate. I assure you that if you run any diagnostic test repeatedly, sometimes there will be a positive result when there’s nothing in the sample. Nowhere in the world has this ‘operational false positive rate’ been released. You should disregard all announcements about case rates in your community because they’re completely fraudulent.”
On mass testing of people with no symptoms: “[It] has no underpinning science at all – it’s just a way of frightening people. This idea that you can be ill and you can be a respiratory virus threat to someone else, even though you have no symptoms, that was invented in 2020.”
On the rule that if you die within 28 days of a positive test: “That’s just wrong. It’s not a matter of disagreeing professionally, it’s just complete nonsense.”
“Basically, everything your government has told you about this virus, everything you need to do to stay safe, is a lie. None of the key themes that you hear talked about, from asymptomatic transmission to top-up vaccines, not one of those things is supported by the science. Every piece has cleverly chosen adjacency to something that probably is true, but is itself a lie.”
On the censorship and personal attacks on social media: “What it did was it caused less confident and less angry people to stop commenting. As time went on, I found that when I talked to fellow scientists - often retired scientists or academics, people I grew up with, who now hold chairs in immunology – they would agree with me, privately…but the difference was that they were not willing to say anything in public because they said, ‘It’s been intimated that the authorities in the university don’t want us to challenge the government narrative or that if its advisers, so we’re not.’ And that’s what happened, we ended up with people who looked the other way, and the fewer people there were like me.”
“When [your government] lie to you about something technical, something you can check, and they do so repeatedly, over months, and they do it over many elements of the same event – if they’re not telling the truth, that means there’s something else afoot.”
“For the working-age population, Covid-19 is less of a threat to you than influenza and you’re still being told to run away and hide after 15 months? You must know that this is completely inappropriate and something else is happening.”
On funding for research: “These days, the major funding bodies are still governments, but they tend to decide directional themes, often agreed internationally. Basically, if your research falls into one of those themes, you might get funded, and if it doesn’t, you literally will be starved out. The only other source of funding is large private organisations. So academic researchers pretty much have to toe the line. Independent research is not only often not supported, but it’s not tolerated. So they won’t contest the Covid narrative.
Over the last three months, I’ve spoken to eight professors at UK universities, whose discipline includes immunology, and I’ve discussed with them what I’m going to tell you about virus variants, and they’ve all agreed with my interpretation. None of them will say anything and it’s because: ‘I won’t get a grant from the Wellcome Trust’ or ‘The medical council has suggested I won’t get grants if I speak about this stuff’. So I want you to know that the academics in your country are easily pushed around by both politicians and people with lots of money. They’ve got to pay attention to who’s buttering their bread and they’re not able to be independent any more.”
On Covid-19 vaccines: “These gene-based vaccines are not approved – they are only available under an Emergency Use Authorisation. So, if there wasn’t an emergency, they simply couldn’t be administered at all. We don’t know very much about them and we don’t know anything at all about the potential long-term side effects, so it’s inappropriate to be giving them to all but the most vulnerable people.”
“Ask friends: were they informed, in writing, that these are experimental medicines that have not yet been approved? If you weren’t, you were administered an experimental agent without your consent. That is contrary to the Nuremburg Code. I’m sorry to say that NHS doctors who are administering these agents to people who are not at risk from the virus, and are not telling them that they’re experimental, are breaching the Nuremburg Code - and I believe they’re doing it knowingly. And I think those physicians should be tried on those charges and appropriate sentences handed down. So if you’re one of those physicians, I hope to be around to see you in court.”
On vaccine passports: “It’s going to be the world’s first database that contains your name, a unique digital ID in the same format as absolutely everyone else on the planet and it’ll have an editable health-related flag. The algorithm that works out what you can do with or without your vaccine passport, that’s what’s going to control the rest of your life, until you die. You might think that’s an exaggeration – that you’re only going to need them to enter a sports ground… That might be true initially, but imagine if they say you now need your vaccine passport to enter a large shopping complex and then every large store? You can’t control what those rules are – you’ve no idea who’s setting those rules. You may not be able to enter a shop, you may not be able to use your bank card – all somebody needs to do is set a rule. Don’t allow this system to come into force – it’s going to be used to coerce you.”
On top-up vaccines: “I can’t think of a single benign interpretation for the creation of these top-up vaccines, let alone the lies that surround them, and I’m absolutely terrified that the combination of vaccine passports and top-up vaccines is going to lead to the deliberate execution of potentially billions of people.”
“No-one is paying me to do this. I am receiving absolutely nothing except criticism and social isolation from my peers. The reason I think you can trust that what I’m saying is sincere is that I’m paying to do this. I’ve lost work, I’ve had people I’ve known for decades that no longer want to speak to me. And if you check any one of the things I’ve said, you will find it to be true.”
See more interviews and testimonies at Planet Lockdown.
Comments